Skip to content

Conversation

azurelinux-security
Copy link
Contributor

@azurelinux-security azurelinux-security commented Aug 8, 2025

Auto Patch golang for CVE-2025-47906.

Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner-chatbot/_build/results?buildId=893991&view=results

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?

  • Auto Patch golang for CVE-2025-47906 (HIGH).
Change Log
  • CVE-2025-47906
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES/NO

Associated issues
  • N/A
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2025 20:18
@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal requested a review from a team as a code owner August 8, 2025 20:18
@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

/azurepipelines run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

Buddy Build

@Malateshk007 Malateshk007 requested a review from mfrw August 11, 2025 11:50
@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

We have a few other CVEs to be clubbed in.
@kgodara912 is dealing with this

@realsdx
Copy link
Contributor

realsdx commented Aug 22, 2025

/azurepipelines run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@realsdx
Copy link
Contributor

realsdx commented Aug 24, 2025

The ptests for 'gh' package failed which was not failing before. Please look into it @Kanishk-Bansal

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

/azurepipelines run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favour of #14552

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fasttrack/2.0 PRs Destined for Azure Linux 2.0 Packaging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants